Technological Wanderings - nuclear http://www.technologicalwanderings.co.uk/taxonomy/term/129 en Down with fundamental forces! http://www.technologicalwanderings.co.uk/node/76 <div class="field field-name-taxonomy-vocabulary-1 field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above"><div class="field-label">Keywords:&nbsp;</div><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="/taxonomy/term/128">idiot</a></div><div class="field-item odd"><a href="/taxonomy/term/129">nuclear</a></div><div class="field-item even"><a href="/taxonomy/term/130">power</a></div><div class="field-item odd"><a href="/taxonomy/term/131">ignorance</a></div><div class="field-item even"><a href="/taxonomy/term/132">caveman</a></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A lovely little gem of a comment on the BBC website today: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_east/8594152.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_east/8594152.stm</a></p> <p>"Dylan Morgan, from campaign group People Against Wylfa B, said nuclear power was a "failed 20th Century technology"."</p> <p>Yup.<br /> Said a man whose very existence is thanks to nuclear power. A man who might in his next breath suggest using solar energy instead.</p> <p>It's this sort of person that means Britain lost its supersonic aircraft, it's spacecraft, it's rocket program. Putting us back into the stone age one idiotic comment at a time.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:09:27 +0000 techuser 76 at http://www.technologicalwanderings.co.uk http://www.technologicalwanderings.co.uk/node/76#comments